If you woulds look at how the J.W. really believe about the stone crying out it would change your concept. They state "If it were not for Russell the stones would surely cry out." I think that is strange compared that that in NWT it says in Luke 19:
37 As soon as he got near the road down the Mount of Olives all the multitude of the disciples started to rejoice and praise God with a loud voice concerning all the powerful works they had seen, 38 saying: “Blessed is the One coming as the King in Jehovah’s name! Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest places!” 39 However, some of the Pharisees from the crowd said to him: “Teacher, rebuke your disciples.” 40 But in reply he said: “I tell YOU , If these remained silent, the stones would cry out.”
The stones did not need to cry out because Jesus did not rebuke the multitude. WTBTS claims it was Russell who was not silent insead of the multitude. Let me guess Russell is modern day fullfillment of the multitude. Am I missing something? It sounds like it is taking something away from Jesus and replacing it with dogma about Russell.
Why would followers of Rutherford,who kicked out pyramidology, care about Russell?